Jump to content

Ca Emissions Results


enginph
 Share

Recommended Posts

A little high hydro carbons, its running rich. Very low NO..

 

01 Milly S, 109k miles

89 chevron (a little 89 shell mixed),

outside temp: 60F

 

IPB Image

 

BTW the test took about 5-10mins, it doesnt overheat nor the fan came on. I dont know what that fan is supposed to do..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

GOD DAMN IT!!!

 

PUT THE GOD DAMN PROPER GAS IN, run a few tanks, and a fuel cleaner, maybe even an air/fuel flush, then run the test and you will be will with in spec

You're an idiot.

 

If you have high HC and low NOx, then you're not burning enough of the gas that's going in. To fix this you run lower octane or lean out the mixture. You should never be allowed to give advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your HC's are lower than Saint's it's because you now have carbon built up in your cylinders causing higher compression, which means you now need higher octance gas....Yay for you (<-sarchasm). And I distinctly remember you posting that in VA you didn't get the numbers on the test, just a pass or fail without details. So, you're full of shit.

 

On a side note, MTS, do you have your last test results still? I can't remember off hand, but I think our limits are actually lower than CA limits. 711 seems really high for NOx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you are partially correct ren, the last report where the numbers were reported was 2004, as I said above, my 2006 just has a "pass/fail" since they've gone to obd2 testing instead of dynos.

 

My car is right at factory spec, because I'm not a cheap ghetto jew penny pincher, use the right gas, automakers are not in cohorts with energy companies, infact in reality there more or less at war with each other.

 

Its a huge selling drawback, its REQUIRED fora reason, its not suggested, its required, start using 20w-50 motor oil, windshield washer fluid as coolant, and maple syrup as brake fluid, see the difference, thats the problem with your gas.

 

I have gone over this time and time again, as gas gets more expensive, its rationally cheaper to use prem, now none of this should matter since its required and I can't stand people bitching about gas prices, buy a tank of gas in europe, see how it feels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your HC's are lower than Saint's it's because you now have carbon built up in your cylinders causing higher compression, which means you now need higher octance gas....Yay for you (<-sarchasm). And I distinctly remember you posting that in VA you didn't get the numbers on the test, just a pass or fail without details. So, you're full of shit.

 

On a side note, MTS, do you have your last test results still? I can't remember off hand, but I think our limits are actually lower than CA limits. 711 seems really high for NOx.

 

 

 

[attachmentid=924]

 

Emissions.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ca is suppose to have the strictest, my car however does not have the ca emissions sticker, probably because it was an east coast only car.

 

I really hate how alot of cars are ca certified, yet may not come with in a thousand miles of those hippies

 

on a side note, MTS's HC are very close to the limit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ca is suppose to have the strictest, my car however does not have the ca emissions sticker, probably because it was an east coast only car.

 

I really hate how alot of cars are ca certified, yet may not come with in a thousand miles of those hippies

 

on a side note, MTS's HC are very close to the limit

 

 

 

That was fouled plugs and Super gas.... still haven't had time to redo since plug change, mid-grade and CAI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chrysler engines are a knockoff of Henry Ford's original design. Shitheads still use pushrods...no joke.

 

Rather than fuel mileage only, cafe should include output/litre of displacement (without boost). Any engine under 80hp/litre should be banned. They should also take vehicle weight into account. Anything over 3000lbs should be restricted to the right lane only...no fucking exceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ren, the last thing you want is another 5.9 flame, I HATE the 5.9 engine, yes its a good engine, but your paying 1200 more for 10hp over the 5.2 which is just as, and more reliable, people say theres 5.9's are oh so fast and can take anything.

 

there is a bet from some guy on jeepsunlimited who thinks his 5.9 could take out an Audi R8, all this after there was a professional comparision video where it raped the SRT8.

 

5.9L for 245hp...yet the 4.7 1 year later does 230hp with 4.7, and a 6.0 engine does 660hp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ha!!!

 

I found it, my last emissions report before they went to obd2 reading and stopped giving results, interesting how there are some pretty different results, I'm not suprised at all where mine fell, closest to stock spec. Mine is the 3rd one down.

 

(40kph = roughly 25mph, use that for comparsion)

 

emissions.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ha!!!

 

I found it, my last emissions report before they went to obd2 reading and stopped giving results, interesting how there are some pretty different results, I'm not suprised at all where mine fell, closest to stock spec. Mine is the 3rd one down.

 

(40kph = roughly 25mph, use that for comparsion)

 

Hmm bhr has high HC for obvious reasons but i wonder why he has high NO. And MTS why yours is around limits, s/c?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...