mts Posted June 4, 2006 Report Share Posted June 4, 2006 Scuderi puts another twist on the Otto cycle Posted Jan 19th 2006 2:00PM by Eric Bryant I'll admit to having a soft spot in my heart for those that make an honest effort at refining 140-year-old technology, and so I'm eagerly awaiting to see the outcome of Scuderi's recent win of a $1.2M Department of Defense contract to develop its split-cycle engine. So what exactly does Scuderi's concept involve? I think it's best shown via an animation or a walk though the company's full theory of operation, but if forced to put it into a few words, I'd describe this as a Miller-cycle engine that uses half of the engine's cylinders to provide mechanical supercharging. So, what are the advantages of this combustion cycle? Well essentially, it aims to do what any refinement of the Otto cycle wishes to achieve - higher peak pressure, and lower post-combustion pressures. If we look at this graph of the cycle to the left, it's advantageous to increase the height of points 3 and 4 while decreasing the height of point 5 and 6 (and the closer we can gets points 5 and 6 to each other, the more energy we extract from the fuel). Specifically, Scuderi's cycle is much like the Miller cycle in that it attempts to delay the opening of the exhaust valve as much as possible to take full advantage of the expanding combustion gases. Traditionally, the Miller cycle -completely unrelated to Miller Time, by the way - uses a mechanical supercharger to prevent reversion of the exhaust gases into the intake tract. Scuderi uses the compression cylinder and a poppet valve and check valve arrangement in the crossover passage to the same effect. Additionally, Scuderi claims that the mixture has a much faster burn rate, and can be ignited at or just after top dead center (TDC). Typical Otto cycle engines touch off the mixture 30-40 degrees before TDC, and thus there is some counterproductive use of the mixture as it starts to expand while the piston is still attempting to compress it. Because of this, there's also said to be a decrease in the oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions. Since preignition is less of a concern, the compression ratio can be increased as well. Scuderi claims that, despite the use of half the cylinders for compression, the engine is more efficient and powerful than a traditional Otto cycle engine of the same displacement and cylinder count. I have no way of personally verifying these claims, so we'll just have to wait and see what the outcome is of the company's DoD contract win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman Posted June 4, 2006 Report Share Posted June 4, 2006 intriging indeed. I'm curious to see if the concept will cause the "additional" of 2 extra cylinders or not. taking a v6 and turning it in a v4 with near the same hp doesn't seem very logically or like a good marking term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted June 4, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2006 Seems like a good MARKETING term in the age of high fuel prices if it indeed saves fuel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted June 4, 2006 Report Share Posted June 4, 2006 I suppose, after all how many people are going to investigate powerplant design and function. High fuel prices do suck, but shit happens, and I'm going to laugh when dubya leaves office and they skyrocket even more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetaway Posted June 7, 2006 Report Share Posted June 7, 2006 cysle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted June 7, 2006 Report Share Posted June 7, 2006 cysle :getrocked!: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetaway Posted June 12, 2006 Report Share Posted June 12, 2006 just your friendly neighborhood typo patrol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted June 12, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 12, 2006 It was corrected... :getrocked!: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetaway Posted June 13, 2006 Report Share Posted June 13, 2006 As it should have been ... though only after I pointed it out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted June 14, 2006 Report Share Posted June 14, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted June 14, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 14, 2006 :getrocked!: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetaway Posted June 14, 2006 Report Share Posted June 14, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted June 14, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 14, 2006 Oh now you want to whip me? NO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetaway Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 Funny how your mind immediately goes to that... That is whipping your lax typing into shape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troutman Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 But MTS wants to be whipped in a jiggly fashion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted June 17, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 NO THANKS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.