///BHRpowered Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Seriously people, how the fuck are people this stupid, I don't like taxes but I know some are needed, but anything over 30% is just robbery, under the illegal obama you would pay over 40%, oh sure its ok for people who make less to say the rich should, but what part of a percentage don't you hippies understand? 40% of your income might be 40,000 dollars a year and you can't afford to pay another 10,000 so you think "oh the rich can pay an extra 10k" no you stupid hippie, because they might pay 40MILLION in taxes and have to pay an extra 10 MILLION in taxes, then instead of getting some the rich get clever (and have the resources) and hold there money overseas, or worse they just stay out of the country for a year and are tax free among many many other things. So instead of taking your 35% you got greedy, went for more and now you've lost it all. "April 2nd, 2009 From the latest Opinion Dynamics poll: 1) 78% of people believe no one should pay more than 30% in taxes. 2) 40% of people believe we should increase taxes on the wealthiest individuals so “nobody gets too rich” No matter how you cut it, there’s a significant portion of people who agreed with both of these statements. How do you explain this? A) People don’t realize that the rich already pay more than 30%. People don’t think of rich people as people. They insert themselves and think ‘30% is too much for me to pay’-and don’t realize the hypocrisy of advocating taxes well above 30% in their other answer. C) People are really stupid. D) Something else? Which is it? By the way, Obama wants to raise taxes to at least 39.6% for the highest bracket. Only 10% of people believe they should be 31% or higher. With his changes in deductions, other taxes, etc–the real rate will be over 40%. Only 4% believe taxes should be that high. How do republicans lose these arguments? " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 I hope y'all get income taxed up the hoop, like we are up here.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 I would perfer your taxes be cut to 30%. ideally taxes would be cut to a flat rate of 15% and people fend for themselfs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Explain how your ideology would ever handle your country's debt load? WEAK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 mts - under the illegal it would not it would have to be a long term plan (say 10-20 years) to put it blatantly we would stop WASTING money, how the fuck can we sit around donating money to other parts of the world when whe have bills, under bush it wasn't so bad, he atleast balanced the checkbook so to say, obama has the nerve to tell people to live with in there means but then spends 44% MORE then income for his pork programs. When I come to power the federal budget would be SLASHED by 60%, surplus will go to paying back other nations and having us be debt free, then as the amount comes down taxes are gradually reduced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Every blood sucking "senator" in your country needs to fired and "exported" if you truly want to save money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted May 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 mts, I believe politics should never be a career. do you know why we have 12 jurors on a trial that are randomly picked from the community? When founded people considered having a jury made up of scholars who's job it would be to serve on all trial, this later became the supreme court but with tweaks to make it fair, ben franklan stood up and said there should be 12 people selected at random so that a fair trial would be received. I firmly believe no one except possibly a governor should be allowed to serve more then 3 terms MAX, 2 for the president. CongressMAN, senators, everyone limited to 2 terms and thats it. They should be forced to be influenced by the laws they pass from the day its done and live with until the end of there days, that way people might actually I don't know, READ THE FUCKING STIMULUS BILL before just blindly voting jessie jackson and al sharpton, there the biggest racists of all, supporting your own race is still racism, If a white man screams white power he is a racist, but if a black man screams black power he is an activist? no no no, you are a biggest racist. And so I say this, jessie jackson and al sharpton and many other ignorant ghetto rats voted for the illegal not because of his policies, but because he is a nappy headed hoe and no other reason - therefore they are racist and voted ONLY because he was like them yet then have the nerve to give white people shit for voting for a white guy - even when they can actually name his policies and beliefs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 The especially wonderful term of 'reverse racism'..... WTF is that? what is the opposite of racism??? Acceptance. COME ON PEOPLE pull your heads out of your dumb asses and see what the world is really handing you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troutman Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Positive discrimination is a go-nowhere debate not worth buying into. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted May 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 as I have said before jessie jackson and al sharpton are some of the most racist people on the planet I'm not a racist, I'm a realist - and to some extend a genoist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveSter Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 The fact that you want genocide makes you a racist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troutman Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 genoist was not found in the English Dictionary Did you want to search for: egoist enlist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted May 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 steve - you ignorant hippie genocide would fix MANY problems, and I mean MANY MANY problems, a good 3-4 billion GONE in a flash but that is not what a genoist is, a genoist is someone who believes in the near future people will be genetical engineered for success and ONLY those who have been engineered as oppose to natural birth will be able to function in society or if you want the offical "Genoism is a neologism coined by Andrew Niccol, used to describe unethical and illegal genetic discrimination. Predictions of physical and mental performance are computed via genetics from DNA collected from hair, fingernails, skin flakes, spit swabs, eyelashes, etc. Upon birth, a number of genetically-induced characteristics are calculated: physical and intellectual capacity, life expectancy, probable successful diseases, and likely causes of death, all determined via blood samples and genetic testing. Job interviews, health insurance purchasing, and even potential dates can be sized up according to the perceived quality of the person's DNA due to advancements in genome sequencing. This put an ironic twist to Darwin's sexual selection for good genes" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveSter Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 Who said "Genoism"? GENOCIDE: "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group." Fine it would fix some problems, but its so wrong in so many ways. Our world does not work like this and it never will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted May 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 27, 2009 seriously, your an idiot I said genoism, it is 2,138% different then genocide. when I say genocide I say genocide, which I'm in favor of, but genoism is a much better fix to long term problems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.