latinopikachu Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Lord ///BHR is set up to be utterly pwned once again. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I wouldn't want to discuss engine efficiency with anyone claiming steam engines are efficient. HMMM being a steam engineer.... the steam turbines were highly efficient, and the boiler plant (1959 B&W D-type) was running at relatively high thermal efficiency. Our biggest losses where water, from gland sealing, valve stem leaks, etc. We re-tubed one of our boilers after a superheater failure. Once shut down, the boiler would hold heat and pressure for almost 2 days without a fire. But we are talking 550psi and 850 F And in now way am I siding with BHR nor defending him, as I know he would NEVER understand Bernouilli's principles of thermodynamics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Calculating the thermal efficiency of a boiler plant, factoring heat exchangers, pipe losses, pump curves, etc.... about a 4-7 hour mathematical calculation.... I know it was the one question final exam in Advanced Thermodynamics when I went to college. 16 pages of math, and hours of headache. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enginph Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I wouldn't want to discuss engine efficiency with anyone claiming steam engines are efficient. HMMM being a steam engineer.... the steam turbines were highly efficient, and the boiler plant (1959 B&W D-type) was running at relatively high thermal efficiency. Our biggest losses where water, from gland sealing, valve stem leaks, etc. We re-tubed one of our boilers after a superheater failure. Once shut down, the boiler would hold heat and pressure for almost 2 days without a fire. But we are talking 550psi and 850 F And in now way am I siding with BHR nor defending him, as I know he would NEVER understand Bernouilli's principles of thermodynamics. I bet your plant cannot create energy by itself? Like if you feed the output energy back to input, you cannot get anything from it Bernoulli, isnt he the fluidics guy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Steam plant..... fluid flow. Compressible flow in thermodynamics Another useful form of the equation, suitable for use in thermodynamics, is: is the enthalpy per unit mass, which is also often written as (not to be confused with "head" or "height"). Note that where is the thermodynamic energy per unit mass, also known as the specific internal energy or "sie." The constant on the right hand side is often called the Bernoulli constant and denoted . For steady inviscid adiabatic flow with no additional sources or sinks of energy, is constant along any given streamline. More generally, when may vary along streamlines, it still proves a useful parameter, related to the "head" of the fluid (see below). When the change in can be ignored, a very useful form of this equation is: where is total enthalpy. When shock waves are present, in a reference frame moving with a shock, many of the parameters in the Bernoulli equation suffer abrupt changes in passing through the shock. The Bernoulli parameter itself, however, remains unaffected. An exception to this rule is radiative shocks, which violate the assumptions leading to the Bernoulli equation, namely the lack of additional sinks or sources of energy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Here is a write up of the plant I used to work with... http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/canada/sys...ropulsion/y100/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enginph Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Here is a write up of the plant I used to work with... http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/canada/sys...ropulsion/y100/ Looks hot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ing-schu@online.no Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I am aware steam turbines have a fairly good efficiency, around 50%? Now when steam engines were claimed to be efficient, I read that as reciprocating steam engine. In its simplest form I believe it has an efficiency in the region of 1, repeating one %. That is not an overwhelming efficiency in my book. But of course, sufficient in non driven applications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveSter Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 When i said steam engine werent efficient I was speaking of the older steam powered cars. But even now our gasoline engines arent efficient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latinopikachu Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 jeebus I didn't realise MTS was so smart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mts Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 When i said steam engine werent efficient I was speaking of the older steam powered cars. But even now our gasoline engines arent efficient. The old recips were highly inefficient, but having worked on a couple... fun to operate. A closed steam plant can run upwards of 80% efficient thermodynamically. While ICEs are lucky to be 35%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 I have not been owned at anything, although when I look at how the world is rocketing down the spiral staircase I only have to read comments from people who believe in this garbage now for the record I don't see steam as a good idea, the only point I was making is that its BETTER then lpg since it has none of the drawbacks that make lpg not only unrealistic but not feasible under any condition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latinopikachu Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 ROCKETING DOWN THE SPIRAL STAIRCASE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH THAT HAS TO BE THE FUNNIEST THING I'VE HEARD ALL WEEK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveSter Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 BHR Shhhhhhhhhh there is no recovering from that fatal ownage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enginph Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 A cobra once bit Chuck Norris's leg. After 5 days of excruciating pain, the cobra died. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latinopikachu Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 mrhq meh, i say, meh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troutman Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latinopikachu Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 i like the MTS cheerleader smiley better this one i demand it be readded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 there was no ownage steve, and don't use the crappy internet "we don't have the space to spell" I'm amazed how I can sit with people on a clear day and tell them the sky is blue, but they say its brown because there head is in the sand...wai those are obama supportors, well same thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ing-schu@online.no Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 The person who most likely has the head stuck deep in the sand on this forum is you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveSter Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 BHR^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enginph Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
///BHRpowered Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 thats pretty much sums up hippies, but as for my hand in the sand, no. I'm very active in explaining what will really happen with these policies, and I'v yet to be wrong that in and of itself is the only thing that frightens me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renboy Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 I skipped about 6 pages worth of *reading* so I don't know when exactly this thread died. Anyhow, I'm going to switch my e46 to run a dual fuel setup with LPG. As I see it, it pays for itself in a year, then every following year I save $2000. That's a lot of mods that this will cover. Slightly used s/c kits for e46's are selling for about $2000. Much better option than any other fuel in my opinion; diesels are loud and expensive initially, not to mention you can never undo having a diesel (without selling it), CNG has too great a power loss, hybrids are like diesels, expensive, heavy, and useless. Finally gasoline, expensive. Not to mention, with LPG engines last longer because the cylinders don't get washed like they do with gas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enginph Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 with LPG engines last longer because the cylinders don't get washed like they do with gas. People always have injector and valve problems. Dont know about new systems, cuto says they are better now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.